Get our E-Alerts
Articles ▼ All Issues About Us ▼ Submit Manuscript Get our E-Alerts
Review Article
06 Aug 2025
Postbiotics and Atopic Dermatitis: Aiming to Modulate the Gut-Skin Axis
Meshi Paz, Peter Lio
Review Article
25 Jun 2024
Postbiotics and Atopic Dermatitis: Aiming to Modulate the Gut-Skin Axis
Meshi Paz, Peter Lio
DOI:
10.64550/joid.9kv22073
Reviewed by:
Rachel Day, MD, Kurt Ashack, MD, Raja Sivamani, MD, In Young Kim, MD
Abstract

The intricate interplay of the gut-skin axis reveals the therapeutic potential of postbiotics in managing atopic dermatitis (AD), a chronic inflammatory skin disorder. The bidirectional communication between the gut and the skin highlights the role of microbiota in immune modulation, metabolism, and barrier function. AD has been linked to dysbiosis of the gut microbiome, mediated by the gut-skin axis and the neuro-immuno-cutaneous-endocrine (NICE) system. As such, these networks demonstrate a potential target for treating AD. While probiotics have shown promising results in addressing skin disorders, concerns about the effects of live microorganisms have prompted investigation of postbiotics, nonviable microorganisms and their byproducts. This safer and more stable alternative exhibits immunomodulatory effects and includes short-chain fatty acids, cell wall fragments, enzymes, and neuropeptides. Effects from strengthening epithelial barriers, protecting against pathogens, and downregulating inflammation have been described with their use. This paper establishes the groundwork supporting the use of postbiotics as a promising therapeutic approach for AD, offering similar benefits to live probiotics without the associated concerns and constraints. Mainly, Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains and their components, emerge as key modulators of the NICE network. Through this holistic approach, the use of postbiotics aims to address the multifaceted nature of AD. This research establishes the foundation for further exploration the clinical efficacy of postbiotics in long-term AD management.

Introduction

The human microbiome, an intricate constellation of microorganisms, plays a crucial role in health and disease, influencing a variety of disorders involving the skin and gastrointestinal (GI) tract.1 By modulating these microbes and their physiologic effects, potential therapeutic interventions can provide antimicrobial protection, enhance immunomodulation, and strengthen epithelial barrier maintenance.2 Emerging research on postbiotics—non-viable microbial cells and their components—suggests they offer health benefits similar to probiotics but without associated risk such as infections and gene transfer of antibiotic resistance. Unlike prebiotics, which are substrates utilized by host microorganisms, postbiotics encompass a range of substances produced by probiotics that can provide health benefits, offering a more tolerable and more stable therapeutic alternative.3 This paper focuses on the potential of postbiotics to modulate the gut-skin axis and treat skin disorders such as atopic dermatitis, leveraging their safe profile and robust efficacy.

Gut-Skin Axis

The gut-skin axis refers to the bidirectional communication between gut dysbiosis and skin homeostasis.4 Both the gut and the skin perform immunological and neuroendocrine functions, constantly adapting to environmental changes to maintain homeostasis.5 Each organ hosts a unique microbiome that enhances their respective immunoprotective functions, with systemic circulation enabling communication via immune cells, hormones, and metabolites. Therefore, dysbiosis in one can lead to disruptions in both, affecting their functions in immune protection.1,6

The key mediators of gut-skin communication interact to maintain this crosstalk. Specifically, this includes the role of immune cells like T cells and dendritic cells, as well as cytokines like IgA, in forming mucosal-associated lymphoid tissues (MALTs). These tissues protect against pathogens and inflammatory triggers, emphasizing their essential role in the immune system.5 Neuroendocrine mediators including cortisol, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), serotonin, dopamine, and GABA further modulate the gut-skin axis to regulate inflammation, itching, and barrier maintenance.1,7 Together, these dynamics constitute the neuro-immuno-cutaneous-endocrine (NICE) network, acting as the interface between epithelial dysbiosis and facilitating the gut-skin connection.8 (See Figure 1)

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Description:

Probiotics and Postbiotics

Probiotics, live microorganisms that modulate the microbiome, increase populations of beneficial bacteria to regulate and strengthen the host immune response. Probiotics achieve such positive effects by introducing more quantities of beneficial bacteria already present.9 One of the most common strains of bacteria in the gut as well as probiotics is Bifidobacterium, known to promote gut health by its efficient carbohydrate and tryptophan metabolism. They are most notable for their use of dietary fiber for production of SCFAs, which are crucial for maintaining barrier integrity and modulating the inflammatory response.10 Another microbe commonly found in the gut and probiotics is Lactobacillus, which mainly generates lactic acid through its fermentation of refined sugars.11,12 Along with other microorganisms, these bacteria facilitate probiotic effects by clearing toxins, restricting the binding of pathogenic bacteria, and bolstering the immune response through their metabolites.9

When viable probiotic bacteria die, their cell components and metabolites remain bioactive and beneficial.13 This concept underpins postbiotics, the non-viable microorganisms and their nonliving byproducts that maintain health effects.2 These bioactive substances—including SCFAs, cell wall fragments, enzymes, and other metabolites—continue to exert anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, immunomodulatory, and antibacterial functions on the gut and thus improve overall health.14

One mechanism of postbiotics is protecting against pathogens. Postbiotics can compete with pathogens for adhesion sites, thus preventing their colonization. Certain metabolites, such as lactic acid and bacteriocins, also contribute by enhancing the antimicrobial properties against invasive bacteria and biofilms formed by pathogenic bacteria. Other mechanisms are strengthening the mucosal and epithelial barrier function and regulating immune responses. Through the modulation of certain cytokines (ie interleukins and TNF) and the elimination of free radicals, postbiotics exhibit anti-inflammatory and antioxidative effects, respectively.2

Atopic Dermatitis

AD is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by pruritus, dry skin, eczematous patches, and lichenification. The pathophysiology centers around impaired skin barrier function.15 Consequently, irritants, allergens, and pathogens are able to cross the skin barrier, leading to inflammation and the classical symptoms of AD. The primary mechanism of inflammation in AD arises from an overactive Th2 response, leading to increased IL-4, IL-5, IL-13 and thus elevated IgE synthesis. The inflammation further disrupts the epithelial barrier and exacerbates the disease.15,16

Gut Microbiome & AD

Compared to healthy individuals, those with AD exhibit a gut dysbiosis characterized by reduced diversity and lower counts of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus.7 This altered microbial composition in the gastrointestinal tract causes decreased production of SCFAs, specifically acetate, propionate, and butyrate.10 These SCFAs maintain the barrier integrity of the gut and modulate inflammation and immune responses, suggesting a crucial function in influencing systemic health and AD exacerbations.17 SCFAs also directly influence the cutaneous microbial profile, serving as the pivotal link between changes in gut and skin microbial compositions.18 Individuals with AD often show increased levels of pathogenic bacteria, including Staphylococcus aureus, Clostridium difficile, and E. coli.19 These bacteria lead to immune dysregulation and increased intestinal permeability, worsening symptoms of AD by promoting toxin production and further gut barrier disruption.20

The interplay between gut dysbiosis and AD is mediated by the gut-skin axis and the NICE network. The relationship depends on an abnormal Th2 immune response and a dysfunctional hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, which together attenuate the function of the NICE system in AD.21 This disturbance affects both the circulating immune compounds and the production of neuroendocrine metabolites within the gut that influence skin health. For example, tryptophan produced by the gut microbiome induces itch, a common symptom in AD. Interestingly, those with AD typically have lower levels of Bifidobacterium, which are key in the metabolism of tryptophan, resulting in higher levels of this amino acid and the associated itch.19

Other gut-derived neuroendocrine molecules in the skin contribute to the pathogenesis and severity of skin diseases, including AD. For instance, substance P, found in higher levels in individuals with AD, activates keratinocytes to produce growth factors and mast cells to release histamine, leukotriene, and tumor necrosis factor. These chemical mediators exacerbate skin inflammation, thus are crucial to the understanding of the pruritus seen in AD.22 Gut microbes significantly influence the levels of such neuropeptides, thereby regulating the downstream inflammatory mediators. Lactobacillus, for example, not only facilitates skin barrier recovery but also reduces skin inflammation related to substance P activity.23 This interaction emphasizes the complex communication between the gut microbiome and the skin via neuroendocrine factors, indicating that modulation of gut microbiota serves as a potential therapeutic target for managing AD.

These findings underscore that the gut microbiome activity influences both local and systemic host responses. This bidirectional communication facilitates the continuous feedback loop between the gut and the skin, impacting both organs’ barrier functions and microbiomes. Therefore, a disruption in the gut microbiome and subsequent skin barrier dysfunction contributes to the pathogenesis of AD.

Effects of probiotics and postbiotics on the treatment of AD

Probiotics target bacterial dysbiosis and the associated immune response to reduce flares of AD as well as systemic inflammation via the NICE network and the gut-skin axis.24 Postbiotics, nonviable cell metabolites, offer similar immunomodulatory effects with fewer risks of side effects compared to live bacteria.25–27

Heat-treated Lactobacillus strains significantly reduced the severity of AD in children aged 4-30 months.26 Progressive improvements in AD symptoms in adults treated with other strains of heat-killed Lactobacillus indicate their utility across various age groups.28,29

Interestingly, the efficacy of postbiotics in treating AD is influenced by both the bacterial strain and the preparation method. Tyndallization involves repeated cycles of heating and cooling, to prepare L. rhamnosus.30 Heat-killed Lactobacilli also offer protection from pathogens through bacteriocins that exhibit both antimicrobial and immunomodulatory effects.26,31 In individuals with AD, who are particularly susceptible to pathogenic bacteria, this defense mechanism is crucial for preventing overgrowth of microbes, like Staphylococcus aureus.24 However, it is important to recognize the limited number of studies on postbiotics. Emerging research demonstrates that heat-killed Lactobacillus strains modulate immune responses, regulating immune T cells and reducing IgE production in mice with AD.32

In addition to producing various neurotransmitters, such as GABA, serotonin, and dopamine, Lactobacilli secrete specific proteins, including protein p40, p75, and aggregation-promoting factor, aiding in the intestinal epithelial barrier integrity and promoting pathogen exclusion.25 This highlights the influence on the NICE system by targeting stress and the HPA axis. Since individuals with AD exhibit a dysfunctional HPA axis and altered NICE involvement, postbiotics show potential to alleviate AD symptoms. Bifidobacterium strains exhibit promising postbiotic potential in similar ways as Lactobacillus, by generating SCFAs, exerting antimicrobial effects, and regulating immune responses.2 (See Table 1)

232927 Postbiotic metabolites and their potential effects

Postbiotic metabolite Effects
Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) Strengthen epithelial barrier, anti-inflammatory, energy source
Lactic acid Immunomodulation, nutrient absorption
Exopolysaccharides Immunomodulation, reinforce gut barrier function, enhance environment for improved efficacy of other probiotic strains
Lipoteichoic acid (LTA) Immunomodulation by stimulating mast cells response and other antimicrobial effects, anti-inflammatory
Bacteriocins Antimicrobial, bactericidal effect
Enzymes (peroxidases, etc) Antioxidant by combating reactive oxygen species, anti-inflammatory
Other proteins (p40, p75, etc) Enhance epithelial barrier, promote pathogen exclusion
GABA Mood regulation, itch restriction
Dopamine Mood regulation, inhibit hair growth
Acetylcholine Reinforce barrier function

By enhancing barrier function, down-regulating inflammatory markers, and protecting against pathogens, postbiotics offer a potential therapeutic approach to AD.

Conclusion

In contrast with live probiotics, postbiotics offer the promise of a safer approach for treating AD. These non-living microorganisms and their metabolites exert therapeutic actions through immunomodulation, strengthening of epithelial barriers, and protecting against pathogens. Specific strains, such as Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, and their components showcase the potential to influence the gut-skin axis as well as the NICE network.

References
1. De Pessemier B., Grine L., Debaere M., Maes A., Paetzold B., Callewaert C.. "Gut–Skin Axis: Current Knowledge of the Interrelationship between Microbial Dysbiosis and Skin Conditions." Microorganisms, vol. 9, 2021, p. 353. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9020353.
Google Scholar
2. Ma L., Tu H., Chen T.. "Postbiotics in Human Health: A Narrative Review." Nutrients, vol. 15, 2023, p. 291. DOI: 10.3390/nu15020291.
Google Scholar
3. Ji J., Jin W., Liu S., Jiao Z., Li X.. "Probiotics, prebiotics, and postbiotics in health and disease." MedComm, vol. 4, 2023, p. e420. DOI: 10.1002/mco2.420.
Google Scholar
4. Lima M., Paulino L.C.. "Oral Postbiotics as a Therapeutic Strategy for Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials." J Am Nutr Assoc, vol. 43, 2024, p. 139. DOI: 10.1080/27697061.2023.2232021.
Google Scholar
5. Mahmud Md R., Akter S., Tamanna S.K... "Impact of gut microbiome on skin health: gut-skin axis observed through the lenses of therapeutics and skin diseases." Gut Microbes, vol. 14, 2022, p. 2096995. DOI: 10.1080/19490976.2022.2096995.
Google Scholar
6. Xu H., Liu M., Cao J... "The Dynamic Interplay between the Gut Microbiota and Autoimmune Diseases." J Immunol Res, vol. 2019, 2019, p. 7546047. DOI: 10.1155/2019/7546047.
Google Scholar
7. Fang Z., Li L., Zhang H., Zhao J., Lu W., Chen W.. "Gut Microbiota, Probiotics, and Their Interactions in Prevention and Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis: A Review." Front Immunol, vol. , 2021, p. 12. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.720393.
Google Scholar
8. Chen G., Chen Z. M., Fan X. Y... "Gut–Brain–Skin Axis in Psoriasis: A Review." Dermatol Ther, vol. 11, 2020, p. 25. DOI: 10.1007/s13555-020-00466-9.
Google Scholar
9. Latif A., Shehzad A., Niazi S.. "Probiotics: mechanism of action, health benefits and their application in food industries." Front Microbiol, vol. 14, 2023, p. 1216674. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1216674.
Google Scholar
10. Markowiak-Kopeć P., Śliżewska K.. "The Effect of Probiotics on the Production of Short-Chain Fatty Acids by Human Intestinal Microbiome." Nutrients, vol. 12, 2020, p. 1107. DOI: 10.3390/nu12041107.
Google Scholar
11. Vlasova A.N., Kandasamy S., Chattha K.S., Rajashekara G., Saif L.J.. "Comparison of probiotic lactobacilli and bifidobacteria effects, immune responses and rotavirus vaccines and infection in different host species." Vet Immunol Immunopathol, vol. 172, 2016, p. 72. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2016.01.003.
Google Scholar
12. Xiao Y., Zhai Q., Zhang H., Chen W., Hill C.. "Gut Colonization Mechanisms of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium: An Argument for Personalized Designs." Annu Rev Food Sci Technol, vol. 12, 2021, p. 213. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-food-061120-014739.
Google Scholar
13. Vinderola G., Sanders M. E., Salminen S.. "The Concept of Postbiotics." Foods, vol. 11, 2022, p. 1077. DOI: 10.3390/foods11081077.
Google Scholar
14. Thorakkattu P., Khanashyam A.C., Shah K... "Postbiotics: Current Trends in Food and Pharmaceutical Industry." Foods, vol. 11, 2022, p. 3094. DOI: 10.3390/foods11193094.
Google Scholar
15. Lugović-Mihić L., Meštrović-Štefekov J., Potočnjak I... "Atopic Dermatitis: Disease Features, Therapeutic Options, and a Multidisciplinary Approach." Life, vol. 13, 2023, p. 1419. DOI: 10.3390/life13061419.
Google Scholar
16. Boguniewicz M., Leung D.Y.. "Atopic Dermatitis: A Disease of Altered Skin Barrier and Immune Dysregulation." Immunol Rev, vol. 242, 2011, p. 233. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2011.01027.x.
Google Scholar
17. Trompette A., Pernot J., Perdijk O... "Gut-derived short-chain fatty acids modulate skin barrier integrity by promoting keratinocyte metabolism and differentiation." Mucosal Immunol, vol. 15, 2022, p. 908. DOI: 10.1038/s41385-022-00524-9.
Google Scholar
18. Salem I., Ramser A., Isham N., Ghannoum M. A.. "The Gut Microbiome as a Major Regulator of the Gut-Skin Axis." Front Microbiol, vol. , 2018, p. 9. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01459.
Google Scholar
19. Sadowsky R. L., Sulejmani P., Lio P. A.. "Atopic Dermatitis: Beyond the Skin and Into the Gut." J Clin Med, vol. 12, 2023, p. 5534. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12175534.
Google Scholar
20. Penders J., Thijs C., van den Brandt P. A... "Gut microbiota composition and development of atopic manifestations in infancy: the KOALA Birth Cohort Study." Gut, vol. 56, 2007, p. 661. DOI: 10.1136/gut.2006.100164.
Google Scholar
21. Kim Y. J., Granstein R. D.. "Roles of calcitonin gene-related peptide in the skin, and other physiological and pathophysiological functions." Brain Behav Immun - Health, vol. 18, 2021, p. 100361. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbih.2021.100361.
Google Scholar
22. Hosokawa C., Takeuchi S., Furue M.. "Severity scores, itch scores and plasma substance P levels in atopic dermatitis treated with standard topical therapy with oral olopatadine hydrochloride." J Dermatol, vol. 36, 2009, p. 185. DOI: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2009.00621.x.
Google Scholar
23. Gueniche A., Benyacoub J., Philippe D... "Lactobacillus paracasei CNCM I-2116 (ST11) inhibits substance P-induced skin inflammation and accelerates skin barrier function recovery in vitro." Eur J Dermatol EJD, vol. 20, 2010, p. 731. DOI: 10.1684/ejd.2010.1108.
Google Scholar
24. Tanojo N., Citrashanty I., Utomo B... "Oral postbiotics derived from Lactobacillus sp. in treatment of atopic dermatitis: a meta-analysis." Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat, vol. 32, 2023, p. 41. DOI: .
25. Teame T., Wang A., Xie M... "Paraprobiotics and Postbiotics of Probiotic Lactobacilli, Their Positive Effects on the Host and Action Mechanisms: A Review." Front Nutr, vol. 7, 2020, p. 570344. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2020.570344.
Google Scholar
26. Yan D.C., Hung C.H., Sy L.B... "A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Assessing the Oral Administration of a Heat-Treated Lactobacillus paracasei Supplement in Infants with Atopic Dermatitis Receiving Topical Corticosteroid Therapy." Skin Pharmacol Physiol, vol. 32, 2019, p. 201. DOI: 10.1159/000499436.
Google Scholar
27. Rather I. A., Kim B. C., Lew L. C... "Oral Administration of Live and Dead Cells of Lactobacillus sakei proBio65 Alleviated Atopic Dermatitis in Children and Adolescents: a Randomized, Double-Blind, and Placebo-Controlled Study." Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins, vol. 13, 2021, p. 315. DOI: 10.1007/s12602-020-09654-7.
Google Scholar
28. Yamamoto K., Yokoyama K., Matsukawa T... "Efficacy of prolonged ingestion of Lactobacillus acidophilus L-92 in adult patients with atopic dermatitis." J Dairy Sci, vol. 99, 2016, p. 5039. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2015-10605.
Google Scholar
29. Inoue Y., Kambara T., Murata N... "Effects of Oral Administration of Lactobacillus acidophilus L-92 on the Symptoms and Serum Cytokines of Atopic Dermatitis in Japanese Adults: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Clinical Trial." Int Arch Allergy Immunol, vol. 165, 2015, p. 247. DOI: 10.1159/000369806.
Google Scholar
30. Jeong K., Kim M., Jeon S. A., Kim Y. H., Lee S.. "A randomized trial of Lactobacillus rhamnosus IDCC 3201 tyndallizate (RHT3201) for treating atopic dermatitis." Pediatr Allergy Immunol Off Publ Eur Soc Pediatr Allergy Immunol, vol. 31, 2020, p. 783. DOI: 10.1111/pai.13269.
Google Scholar
31. D’Auria E., Panelli S., Lunardon L... "Rice flour fermented with Lactobacillus paracasei CBA L74 in the treatment of atopic dermatitis in infants: A randomized, double- blind, placebo- controlled trial." Pharmacol Res, vol. 163, 2021, p. 105284. DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105284.
Google Scholar
32. Chen H.Y., Chen Y.T., Li K.Y., Huang H.W., Lin Y.C., Chen M.J.. "A Heat-Killed Probiotic Mixture Regulates Immune T Cells Balance and IgE Production in House Dust Mite Extraction-Induced Atopic Dermatitis Mice." Microorganisms, vol. 10, 2022, p. 1881. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10101881.
Google Scholar
138
Downloads
29
Total Views
Article impact
Share
Cite
Article Info
DOI:
10.64550/joid.9kv22073
Reviewed by:
Rachel Day, MD, Kurt Ashack, MD, Raja Sivamani, MD, In Young Kim, MD
View PDF
Citation
Cite as
[1]
“Postbiotics and Atopic Dermatitis: Aiming to Modulate the Gut-Skin Axis: Postbiotics, nonviable microorganisms and their byproducts, hold potential in managing atopic dermatitis through modulation of the gut-skin axis and the neuro-immuno-cutaneous-endocrine (NICE) system”., JOID, vol. 1, no. 1, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.64550/joid.9kv22073.
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.
Download Citation
Export Citation
Expanded image