Shivitrahara lepa (Group II) |
6 months |
RCT |
-Shivitrahara lepa and oral Shvitrahara Kashaya (Group I)
-PUVA (Group III) |
n = 25 (Group I)
n = 15 (Group II)
n = 10 (Group III) |
-VSA Reduction
-Lesion Number |
-Group II experienced a mean reduction in VSA of 0.41 ± 0.28 cm2 (p < 0.001)
-Group II experienced a mean reduction in lesion number of 3.27 ± 0.96 (p < 0001)
-Mean reduction in VSA and in lesion number in Group I/III were significantly greater than II
-8/10 Group III subjects developed adverse reactions |
-Frequency of topical application not specified |
Dhanik et al (2011) |
Gel containing Cucumis melo, SOD, catalase with NB-UVB |
6 months |
Comparative study |
NB-UVB monotherapy |
n = 15 in each treatment group |
-VSA Reduction |
-No significant difference in VSA reduction between each group |
-Frequency of NB-UVB not specified |
Yuksel et al (2009) |
Gel containing Cucumis melo, SOD, catalase and sun exposure |
Twice daily for 6 months |
RCT, R/L controlled |
Placebo gel |
n = 23 |
-VSA Reduction
-Perifollicular pigmentation |
-No significant changes in lesion area and perifollicular pigmentation in both groups |
|
Naini et al (2012) |
Formulation containing Cucumis melo extract, acetylcysteine, phenylalanine (Group A) |
All topicals administered twice daily for 12 weeks |
Open-label study |
-Once Weekly UVB (Group B)
-Topical gel and once weekly UVB (Group C)
-Clobetasol propionate 0.05% ointment (Group D) |
n = 149 |
% Repigmentation |
- >75% repigmentation: 38.4% Group A, 61.1% Group B, 73.5% Group C, 56.2% Group D
-Less than 10% of subjects in each group depicted <25% repigmentation |
|
Buggiani et al (2012) |
Tetrahydrocurcuminoid cream and NB-UVB (Group A) |
-Twice daily for 12 weeks; NB-UVB twice weekly |
RCT, preliminary |
NB-UVB monotherapy (Group B) |
n = 10 |
% Repigmentation, converted into scores |
-Both treatment groups depicted significantly improved repigmentation
-Significant inverse association between repigmentation and duration of disease in both groups
-From week 8 onwards, repigmentation scores in Group A were better than Group B (p = 0.078) |
|
Asawanonda and Klahan (2010) |
Vitilinex (herbal bio-actives) (Group A) |
12-weeks |
RCT |
-Vitilinex with UVB combination treatment (Group B)
-NB-UVB phototherapy alone (Group C) |
n = 62 randomized equally to each treatment group |
% Repigmentation |
- >75% repigmentation: 39% Group A, 69.5% Group B, 37.5% Group C
-50-75% repigmentation: 26% Group A, 17.5% Group B, 25% Group C
- 5-50% repigmentation: 22% Group A, 8.7% Group B, 18.75% Group C
- <25% repigmentation: 13% Group A, 4.3% Group B, 18.75% Group C
- >50% repigmentation: 65% Group A, 87% Group B, 62.5% Group C |
-Frequency of topical application not specified |
Van et al (2019) |
Nigella sativa seed oil |
Twice daily for 6 months |
Open-label study |
|
n = 33 |
% Repigmentation |
-10/23 (43.5%) with facial involvement achieved repigmentation ≥ 50%; significant pre- and post-treatment difference in these 10 (p = 0.001)
-7/16 (43.8%) with hand involvement achieved repigmentation ≥ 50%; significant pre- and post-treatment difference in these 7 (p = 0.005)
-7/8 with genital involvement achieved repigmentation ≥ 50%; significant pre- and post-treatment difference in these 7 (p = 0.004) |
|
Sarac et al (2019) |
Calcipotriol 50 µg/g |
-Twice daily topical monotherapy
-Combination treatment included PUVA 3x weekly
- 3-9 months therapy, mean = 6 months |
Open study |
Combination with oral or topical PUVA |
n = 22 (topical monotherapy)
n = 4 (combination) |
VSA Reduction |
-3/4 (75%) of combination therapy showed good response
-5/22 (23%) of monotherapy showed >90% improvement
-7/22 (32%) showed 50-90% improvement
-5/22 (23%) showed 30-50% improvement
-5/22 (23%) showed <30% improvement |
-Duration of therapy was not controlled
-Only four subjects received combination |
Ameen et al (2001) |
Calcipotriol |
-Daily topical application
-3-6 months, mean = 3.9 months |
Prospective, R/L comparative, open study |
Untreated control lesion |
n = 24 |
% Repigmentation |
-No significant difference between treated and control
-21/24 (87.5%) had no repigmentation
-3/24 (12.5%) had partial repigmentation
Of improved:
-1/3 had repigmentation on the treated lesion and no repigmentation on the untreated control
-2/3 had repigmentation (20% and 30%) on treated but spontaneous repigmentation of (20% and 10%) of untreated control |
-% Calcipotriol not specified
-Duration of therapy was not controlled |
Chiavérini et al (2002) |
Calcipotriol 50 µg/g (Cal) |
Twice daily for 4 months |
Open, comparative clinical trial |
Clobetasol 0.05% (Clo) |
n = 22 Cal
n = 20 Clo |
% Repigmentation |
-Significantly greater repigmentation with Clobetasol than Calcipotriol
-0-25%: 10/22 Cal, 3/20 Clo
-25-50%: 8/22 Cal, 4/20 Clo
-50-75%: 4/22 Cal, 5/20 Clo
-75-100% 0/22 Cal, 4/20 Clo
-100% 0/22 Cal, 4/20 Clo
-4/22 Cal: transient irritation and erythema
-7/20 Clo: transient erythema, acneiform papules, telangiectasia of skin |
|
Köse et al (2002) |
Calcipotriol |
3 months, frequency not specified |
Open, comparative clinical trial |
-Topical betamethasone
-Topical PUVA
-NB-UVB |
n = 34 |
Repigmentation |
-Calcipotriol repigmentation in 1/10 cases (10%)
-Betamethasone repigmentation in 3/11 cases (27%)
-No repigmentation in topical PUVA (0%)
-NB-UVB repigmentation in 7/13 cases (53%) |
-Abstract |
Uksal et al (2002) |
Calcipotriol 50 µg/g cream or ointment |
Twice daily for 6 months |
Prospective, observation study |
|
n = 14, aged 3-12
-9/14 received cream
-5/14 received ointment |
VSA Reduction |
-10/14 showed improvement
-4/14 showed no response
-Better results with ointment than cream
Among responders:
-3 showed complete resolution
-4 showed 50-80% improvement
-3 showed 30-50% improvement |
|
Gargoom et al (2004) |
Calcipotriol 0.005% (Group II) |
-Twice-daily for 3 months
-Group III: betamethasone in the morning, calcipotriene in the evening |
RCT |
-Betamethasone 0.05% (Group I)
-Combination Therapy (Group III) |
n = 15 in each treatment group |
% Repigmentation |
-No patients achieved >75%
-50-75%: 2/15 GI, 1/15 GII, 4/15 GIII
-25-50%: 7/15 GI, 5/15 GII, 7/15 GIII
-Combined therapy had significantly faster repigmentation onset, better stability, less side effects
-Side effects (atrophy, lesional burning) were more common in Group I than II/III (p < 0.05) |
|
Kumaran et al (2006) |
Calcipotriol |
-Twice-daily for 6 months
-Combination treatment included PUVA 3x weekly |
RCT |
Combination with PUVA |
n = 30 in each treatment group |
% Repigmentation |
Group I: 1/6 (16.7%) responded, all with <50% repigmentation
Group II: all patients responded. 70% showed >75% repigmentation |
% Calcipotriol not specified |
Shehzad et al (2007) |
Calcipotriol 0.005% (R side) |
5 months |
Case report, R/L comparative |
Pimecrolimus cream 1% (L side) |
n = 1 |
Clinical improvement of vitiliginous lesions |
-Significant improvement with the two agents, especially pimecrolimus
-Pimecrolimus was more effective
-Re-pigmentation started second month |
-Measurements of surface area reduction not included
-Frequency of topical application not specified |
Bilaç et al (2009) |
Calcipotriene 0.005% (Group C) |
-Twice-daily for 5 months
-Group A: betamethasone in the morning, calcipotriene in the evening |
RCT |
-Betamethasone dipropionate 0.05% (Group A)
-Combination Therapy (Group B) |
n = 20 in each treatment group |
VSA Reduction |
-Final follow-up depicted 80%, 75%, 65% vitiliginous lesion reduction in groups A, B, C, respectively
-Significant difference in lesion reduction among the groups, ANOVA (p < 0.05) |
|
Alam et al (2014) |
Calcipotriol 0.005% (Group A) |
Twice daily for 3 months treatment duration, final follow-up at 4 months |
RCT |
-Betamethasone dipropionate 0.05% (Group B)
-Combination Therapy (Group C) |
n = 53 in each treatment group |
VASI |
-Mean change of VASI: 38.77% Group C, 26.23% Group B, 18.30% Group A
-Mean change in VASI was statistically greater in group C (p = 0.008)
-Side effects included erythema, burning, atrophy, acneiform eruption, with no significant differences between groups |
|
Zahoor et al (2017) |
Tacalcitol 0.0002% |
Once daily for 1 month |
Case report |
Tacalcitol 0.0002% and 30 minutes of sunlight exposure |
n = 1 |
Clinical improvement of vitiliginous lesions |
The region treated with combination therapy healed completely, while the region treated with ointment alone did not improve |
|
Amano et al (2008) |
Tacalcitol 20 µg/g |
Once daily for 9 months |
Case report |
|
n = 1 |
Clinical observation of repigmentation |
Promoted moderate repigmentation of patient’s vitiligo lesions but also hyperpigmentation of freckles |
-Measurement of degree of repigmentation not included |
Oiso and Kawada (2012) |
Topical psoralen and UVA |
4 months |
Open-label study |
UVB radiation |
n = 281 |
% Repigmentation |
-46% treated with topical PUVA showed repigmentation after 4 months
-52% in the UVB group showed repigmentation after 4 months
-In the second group
-Fewer side effects with UVB compared to topical PUVA |
-Frequency of treatment not specified |
Westerhof and Nieuweboer-Krobotova (1997) |
Ointment containing Psoralea corylifolia seed powder |
Once daily for 12 weeks |
Open-label, self-controlled study |
No treatment, control |
n = 20 |
VSA Reduction, documented with 20-megapixel camera |
-Pre- and post-treatment pigmentation differences were statistically significant for small, circular vitiligous lesions (p ≤ 0.05) |
|
Hussain et al (2016) |
Psoralea corylifolia and sunlight |
Once daily for 6 months |
Open, randomized pilot trial |
-Indicated homeopathic treatment
-Combination treatment |
n = 20 in each treatment group |
-VASI
-VitilQoL
-DLQI |
-Intra-group changes were significant in all 3 outcomes (p < 0.001)
-All treatment regimens were equally effective and safe
-Significant differences in groups for VitiQoL total scores, favoring Psoralea corylifolia and combination treatment |
-5 patients dropped out |
Mir et al (2022) |
Khellin gel (water, 2-propanol, propylene glycol, khellin) |
Applied 30 minutes before UVA exposure for 6 months |
Open-label, self-controlled study |
Water, 2-propanol, propylene glycol) |
n = 36 |
% Repigmentation |
-Repigmentation >10% occurred in 86.1% of khellin-treated sides, in contrast to 66.6% in placebo-treated sides (p < 0.01)
-Better results in younger patients with shorter disease duration |
-Frequency of UVA exposure not specified |
Orecchia et al (1998) |
Topical khellin with UVA (KUVA) |
3-5 weekly treatments |
Pilot study |
Systemic PUVA |
n = 33 |
% Repigmentation |
-Local KUVA required longer duration and higher UVA doses
-Better KUVA results with younger patients
-No adverse effects with KUVA
-PUVA adverse effects included erythema, itching, GI disturbances |
-Treatment duration not consistent
-Some subjects had to interrupt therapy course for some time (1-3 months) |
Valkova et al (2004) |
Khellin 4% with monochromatic excimer light 308 nm and vitamin E (Group II) |
Once weekly phototherapy for 12 weeks |
Open-label, controlled study |
-Weekly light therapy and oral vitamin E (Group I)
-Oral vitamin E (Group III) |
n = 16 in each treatment group |
% Repigmentation |
-Excellent repigmentation: 25% Group I, 56.25% Group II, 0% Group III |
|
Saraceno et al (2009) |
Khellin with monochromatic excimer light 308 nm |
Two treatments weekly for 1 year |
Open-label |
|
n = 20 |
% Repigmentation |
- >75% repigmentation in 9/20
-50-75% repigmentation in 5/20
-25-50% repigmentation in 3/20
- <20% repigmentation in 3/20
-No recurrences observed 6 months after treatment |
-Subjects with resistant vitiligo |
Fenniche et al (2018) |
Antioxidant and mitochondrial stimulating formula (Group 5) |
5 months |
RCT |
-Oral antioxidants, phenylalanine, and topical formulation (Group 1)
-Oral antioxidants, phenylalanine, placebo cream (Group 2)
-Oral antioxidants and phenylalanine (Group 3)
--Placebo cream (Group 4) |
n = 100 |
Clinical and histological response |
-Best results depicted by Group 1 (p < 0.001)
-Clinical and histological responses of Groups 1 and 5 were significantly greater than any other group |
-Frequency of topical application not specified |
Rojas-Urdaneta and Poleo-Romero (2007) |
NB-UVB-activated Pseudocatalase PC-KUS |
Twice daily for 8-12 months |
Retrospective study |
NB-UVB monotherapy |
n = 71 (Psuedocatalase)
n = 10 (NB-UVB monotherapy) |
% Repigmentation |
-Cessation achieved in 70/71 (99%) patients receiving pseudocatalase; the remaining patient showed partial progression of the disease on the hands
-Cessation achieved in 3/10 (30%) patients receiving NB-UVB monotherapy |
-Duration of therapy was not controlled |
Schallreuter et al (2008) |
Antioxidant hydrogel with 308 nm excimer laser |
Twice daily except for laser therapy days with two laser sessions weekly; cream application began 15 days before starting laser treatment |
Pilot study, self-controlled, single-blinded |
Vehicle placebo |
n = 10 |
Repigmentation scores
-0: no repigmentation
-1: Up to 25% repigmentation
-2: 26-50% repigmentation
-3: 51-75% repigmentation
-4: 76-100% repigmentation |
-At month 3, lesions treated with active cream exhibited a repigmentation grade of 3.30 ± 0.67, and lesions treated with placebo cream exhibited a grade of 2.60 ± 0.7 (p < 0.01)
-The first signs of repigmentation were observed after a mean of 21.9 ± 13 days in active-group lesions and 27.0 ± 14.9 days in placebo-group lesions (p < 0.05) |
|
Leone and Vidolin (2015) |
Hydrogel consisting of SOD, copper, zinc, vitamin B12, calcium pantothenate and excimer light (Group A) |
Twice weekly for a maximum of 24 sessions |
Open-label, self-controlled study |
Excimer light monotherapy (Group B) |
n = 30 |
% Repigmentation |
-Significantly greater % repigmentation in Group A lesions than Group B (p < 0.001) |
|
Soliman et al (2016) |
Epigallocatechin-3-gallate 3% |
Twice daily for 6 months |
Prospective, self-controlled, comparative, open study |
Pimecrolimus 1% cream |
n = 46 |
VASI |
-VASI reduction of 1.19 ± 0.42 to 0.63 ± 0.38 in EGCG-treated lesions
-VASI reduction of 1.18 ± 0.43 to 0.61 ± 0.36 in pimecrolimus-treated lesions
-No significant difference in VASI score reductions (p = 0.755)
-No serious side effects |
|
Hu et al (2021) |
Coffea sp and Helianthus annuus |
Once daily |
Case report |
|
n = 1 |
Clinical observation of repigmentation |
-Repigmentation began to appear in month 3 |
-Total treatment duration not specified |
Leite et al (2021) |
Turmeric topical cream |
Twice daily for 4 months |
RCT |
Placebo control cream |
n = 24 |
-Lesion size
-VASI
-VNS
-PGA |
-Turmeric cream reduced the size of the lesions and improved lesion’s appearance significantly compared to placebo (p < 0.001)
-Patient’s satisfaction score was higher following turmeric application compared to placebo (p < 0.05) |
|
Jalalmanesh et al (2022) |
Ruxolitinib 1.5% |
Twice daily for 20 weeks |
Open-label, proof of concept |
|
n = 9 |
% VASI Improvement |
-Four patients with significant facial involvement: 76% improvement in facial VASI (95% CI 53-99%; p = 0.001)
-23% improvement in overall VASI in all pts (95% CI 4-43%, p = 0.02)
-Adverse events included erythema, hyperpigmentation, transient acne |
|
Rothstein et al (2017) |
Ruxolitinib |
-Topical ruxolitinib 1.5% applied twice daily (pt 1) |
Case series |
|
n = 2, although one received oral tofacitinib |
Repigmentation |
-Pt 1 observed significant repigmentation of face, except for his forehead, which was regularly protected from the sun by a cap
-Upon removing the cap, he noted repigmentation in his forehead as well |
|
Joshipura et al (2018) |
Ruxolitinib 1.5% with optional NB-UVB |
Twice daily for 32 weeks |
Open-label study, extension |
|
n = 8 |
VASI |
-Significant mean improvement in overall VASI of 37.6% ± 31.2% (p = 0.011) at 52 weeks; effect was most pronounced for facial vitiligo
-5/8 had a treatment response
-5/8 completed the trial and were followed up at 6 months, all of which maintained response
-3/8 had erythema, 2/8 had transient acne |
-32-week extension of study conducted by Rothstein et al (2017) |
Joshipura et al (2018) |
Ruxolitinib cream (1.5% BID, 1.5% QD, 0.5% QD, 0.15% QD) |
Once or twice daily, depending on treatment group for 24 weeks |
RCT |
Control cohort |
n = 130 |
-fVASI
-Protein expression (1,104 proteins) |
-Number of proteins significantly modulated: 204 in 1.5% BID, 162 in 1.5% QD, 71 in 0.5% QD, 29 in 0.15% QD, 56 in vehicle cohort
-Chemokine C-X-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 10 (CSCL10) was significantly down-regulated in 1.5% QD and BID groups |
|
Owens et al (2019) |
Ruxolitinib (1.5% BID, 1.5% QD, 0.5% QD, 0.15% QD) |
Twice-daily 1.5% for 1 year
-Once-daily 1.5%
-Once-daily 0.5%
-Once-daily 0.15 |
RCT |
Control cohort |
n = 157 |
-VASI50
-VASI75
-fVASI50 |
-Week 24 fVASI50: 45% (1.5% BID), 50% (1.5% QD), 26% (0.5% QD), 32% (0.15% QD)
-Week 52: 58% (1.5% BID) reached fVASI50, which was the highest response
-Dose-dependent manner for VASI50 at week 52 |
|
Rosmarin et al (2020) |
Ruxolitinib |
-Twice-daily 1.5% for 1 year
-Once-daily 1.5%
-Once-daily 0.5%
-Once-daily 0.15% |
Sub-analysis from RCT |
Comparison groups included different % formulations and treatment frequencies |
n = 157, randomized equally to each treatment group |
T-VASI50 and T-VASI75 |
-Ruxolitinib 1.5% BID produced highest response in most body areas
-At 1 year, 1.5% BID T-VASI50 and T-VASI75:
-All body regions: 45.0% and 15.0%, respectively
-Head/neck: 60.0% and 55.0%, respectively
-Trunk: 29.4% and 11.8%, respectively
-Upper extremities: 52.9% and 23.5%, respectively
-Lower extremities: 52.6% and 26.3%, respectively
-Hands: 15.0% and 5.0%, respectively
-Feet: 29.4% and 17.6%, respectively |
-Abstract
-Subgroup analysis from NCT03099304 |
Grimes et al (2020) |
Ruxolitinib
cream (1.5% BID, 1.5% QD, 0.5% QD, 0.15% QD) |
Twice-daily 1.5% for 1 year
-Once-daily 1.5%
-Once-daily 0.5%
-Once-daily 0.15% |
Sub-analysis from RCT |
Control cohort |
n = 157 |
-VASI50
-VASI75
-fVASI50 |
-The 1.5% BID dose, VASI50: 60.0% head/neck region, 52.9% upper extremities, 52.6% lower extremities, 15% hands, 29.4% feet
-Of those receiving 1.5% BID, a larger proportion of fVASI50 responders at 24 weeks were ≤ 50 years compared with > 50 years |
-Subgroup analysis from NCT03099304 |
Hamzavi et al (2022) |
Tofacitinib |
Treatment regimen not specified |
Retrospective Case Series |
|
n = 10 |
Repigmentation |
-5 patients achieved some repigmentation at sites of sunlight exposure or NB-UVB |
|
Liu et al (2017) |
Tofacitinib 2% |
Twice daily; the average follow-up time was 153 days (range 63-367) |
Nonrandomized cohort study |
|
n = 16 |
% Repigmentaiton |
-13/16 experienced repigmentation
-4/16 experienced ≥90% repigmentation
-5/16 expereienced 25-75% repigmentation
-4/16 experienced 5-15% repigmentation
-2/16 experienced no change
-1/16 experienced slow progression of depigmentation
-Facial lesions improved more than nonfacial lesions (p = 0.022)
-Patients with Fitzpatrick skin type IV-VI improved more than individuals with lighter skin (p = 0.034) |
-Refractory vitiligo
-Concomitant treatment with topical steroids, topical calcineurin inhibitors, supplements, and phototherapy was allowed
-Treatment duration was not consistent |
Mobasher et al (2019) |
Tofacitinib 2% and NBUVB |
Twice daily for 3 months with 3x weekly NBUVB |
Case series |
|
n = 5 |
-fVASI |
-Mean fVASI at baseline 0.62; mean fVASI at 3 months 0.22 (66% improvement)
-No reported side effects |
|
McKesey and Pandya (2020) |
Tofacitinib 2% and NBUVB |
Twice daily for 7 months |
Case report |
|
n = 1 |
Clinical observation of repigmentation |
-Freckling was observed within 4 weeks
-Only three depigmented linear macules remain after 3 months
-Complete repigmentation at 6 months
-No adverse effects |
|
Olamiju and Craiglow (2020) |
Tofacitinib 2% + vehicle ointment with NB-UVB |
Twice-daily for 9 months and NB-UVB phototherapy 3x weekly |
Case report |
|
n = 1 |
Clinical observation of repigmentation |
-Significant repigmentation observed
-Minor adverse effects included erythema and transient acne |
-Measurement of degree of repigmentation not included |
Ferreira et al (2021) |
Delgocitinib |
Twice daily for 8-12 weeks |
Case series |
|
n = 2 |
Clinical observation of repigmentation |
-Case 1 achieved significant repigmentation at week 8
-Case 2 did not achieve pigmentation at week 12
-No adverse events in either case |
-Treatment duration was not consistent |
Yagi et al (2021) |
Bimatoprost 0.01% |
Twice daily for 12 weeks |
Prospective, self-controlled, comparative, open study |
Tacrolimus 0.1% |
n = 10 |
-VSA Reduction
-VIDA |
-VSA significantly decreased among both groups compared to baseline (p < 0.05)
-No significant difference between groups
-Week 12, >50% repigmentation: 20% bimatoprost group, 10% tacrolimus |
|
Kanokrungsee et al (2021) |
Bimatoprost 0.03% |
20 weeks |
RCT, proof of concept |
-Bimatoprost monotherapy
-Bimatoprost plus mometasone
-Mometasone plus placebo |
n = 32 |
-Global response at week 20 based on an 8-point scale (0 = worse; 7 = cleared)
-Response by anatomic site
-Change from baseline lesion severity
-Safety |
-46% of the bimatoprost plus mometasone group responded overall; 18% in the bimatoprost monotherapy group responded; 0% in the mometasone plus placebo group responded
-No differences in signs and symptoms of irritation among groups |
-Facial lesions were not assessed |
Grimes (2016) |
Bimatoprost 0.01%, NB-UVB, and fractional carbon dioxide |
Twice-daily application for 12 weeks |
Prospective, self-controlled, comparative, open study |
-Application of either bimatoprost 0.01% solution or placebo plus once-monthly fractional CO2 laser and twice-weekly NB-UVB therapy |
n = 15 |
-VSA
-Melanin concentration |
-At week 12, % change in melanin concentration from baseline was greater on the side receiving bimatoprost 0.1% (27.17 ± 13.62% vs. 22.82 ± 10.10% (p = 0.028)
-A non-significant greater change in VSA was observed on the side receiving bimatoprost |
|
Kanokrungsee (2021) |
Honeybee, allium cepa, avena sativa with sunlight exposure |
-Daily application, 20 days followed by 4 days of, for 11 months |
Case report |
|
n = 1 |
% Repigmentation |
-Complete repigmentation of white vitiliginous lesions
-No adverse effects |
|
Djerrou (2015) |